Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Heathen Scouting and Guiding

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Malcolmxl5 (talk) 00:36, 15 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Heathen Scouting and Guiding

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails to meet Wikipedia:Notability. None of the sources in the article meets the criteria for Wikipedia:Reliable sources, and I've failed to find any replacements. Most online search hits for the relevant terms are from blogs that seem to copy their text from Wikipedia. The standard works about neopaganism in the countries mentioned in the article (Norway, Sweden and the United States) contain nothing about the subject. Ffranc (talk) 15:07, 7 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Organizations-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 15:51, 7 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Paganism-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 15:51, 7 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. Per nomination. --jergen (talk) 09:50, 8 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

I am in two minds about this as I think there is a need for an article that deals with attempts to have Scouting without the religious part. I was strongly involved in Scouting until the mid 1960s when I finally accepted that I did not believe in any kind of god. I have over the years continued to support Scouting when my kids were involved but I have not held any warranted position. I think that was Scouting 's loss as I was heavily involved in leader training when I left. However this article is not acceptable as there are no decent references, so delete. --Bduke (talk) 01:05, 9 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Delete the sourcing is way below the level to show notability.John Pack Lambert (talk) 23:03, 9 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this page.