Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Heather Starlet (2nd nomination)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. ·Add§hore· ^{Talk To Me!} 05:28, 2 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Heather Starlet

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Previously deleted article. The

WP:GNG and all relevant guidelines. Cavarrone (talk) 23:36, 26 January 2013 (UTC)[reply

]

Delete per nom. I think it would be useful to underscore the fact that not every Penthouse Pet of the Month is, per se, notable. Also, if one looks through this edit history one will find a troubling pattern of what looks a lot more like trying to create notability than recognize pre-existing notability. I've got no proof, but, as I wrote on this particular article's talk page, my
spider sense is tingling. David in DC (talk) 04:26, 27 January 2013 (UTC)[reply
]

Note: This debate has been added to the WikiProject Pornography list of deletions. Cavarrone (talk) 08:49, 27 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 17:05, 27 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per nom; routine application of pertinent SNG. Hullaballoo Wolfowitz (talk) 21:13, 27 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. Fails GNG without significant coverage by reliable sources. Fails PORNBIO with minor award win and only one AVN nomination as an individual. Scene nominations don't count. • Gene93k (talk) 01:11, 28 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

very weak keep Notability is permanent in Wikipedia. Playboy playmates of the month are/were automatically notable. Wikipedia is not commercial and tries not to be biased. Penthouse is the only equivalent of Playboy; I don't think there is another equivalent. Therefore, Penthouse monthly pets are notable and she is notable. That's actually laughable but Wikipedia rules are rules. Spevw (talk) 03:01, 28 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Playboy playmates are not automatically notable. Several playmate AfDs have closed as redirect. References to both Playboy and Penthouse were removed from PORNBIO a long time ago. • Gene93k (talk) 03:21, 28 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

"Penthouse is the only equivalent of Playboy"?! You obviously haven't been paying attention to
Ladies Home Journal lately. That Betty White is HAWT! David in DC (talk) 04:55, 29 January 2013 (UTC)[reply
]

Delete fails
WP:GNG — Malik Shabazz ^Talk/_Stalk 04:08, 29 January 2013 (UTC)[reply
]

Delete - Fails
WP:ANYBIO. --LlamaAl (talk) 00:47, 2 February 2013 (UTC)[reply
]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this page.