Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Hele-On Bus
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Malcolmxl5 (talk) 00:59, 5 March 2016 (UTC)
Hele-On Bus
- Hele-On Bus (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Article appears to be advertising, non-notable bus company. Fails
Dragon 08:40, 26 February 2016 (UTC)
]
- Note: This debate has been included in the Dragon 08:40, 26 February 2016 (UTC)]
- Note: This debate has been included in the Dragon 08:40, 26 February 2016 (UTC)]
- Delete per nom - Technically the prices and the table of services shouldn't be there .... Remove all of that and you pretty much have an empty article that IMHO probably wouldn't ever be improved/expanded ....., Anyway can't find anything on the bus company either, Fails GNG. –Davey2010Talk 15:07, 26 February 2016 (UTC)
- Delete. Fails WP:GNG and talk) 09:57, 28 February 2016 (UTC)]
- Note: This debate has been included in the talk) 19:22, 29 February 2016 (UTC)]
- Er, did anyone bother to click on those helpful find sources links before condemning this as non-notable? Seems to have received a lot more coverage than is currently in the article. [1] [2] [3]. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 81.103.6.131 (talk) 19:26, 29 February 2016 (UTC)
- @Dragon 21:22, 29 February 2016 (UTC)]
- What on earth is a notable source? Wikipedia notable (in which case WP:RS, so that argument is rubbish. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 81.103.6.131 (talk) 12:58, 4 March 2016 (UTC)]
- What on earth is a notable source? Wikipedia notable (in which case
- @
- Delete as none of this establishes solid independent notability yet. SwisterTwister talk 07:49, 4 March 2016 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.