Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Hempilation, Vol. 2: Free the Weed
Appearance
Source: Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was no consensus. King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 19:03, 14 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Hempilation, Vol. 2: Free the Weed
- Hempilation, Vol. 2: Free the Weed (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
not
]- Comment. Somewhat to my surprise (I guess I haven't read enough issues of High Times) I find that there are some references to this album in reliable sources, notably a detailed 1998 CNN article entitled "Singing the praises of pot on 'Hempilation 2'". The GNews search shows a number of other references to this album, but more of them seem to focus more on its predecessor, Hempilation: Freedom Is NORML, so maybe a good editing result would be to merge this topic as a new section of the existing article about the first album. --Arxiloxos (talk) 17:04, 30 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Hmmm...now I'm considering withdrawal for a week or so... if the article gets better. The main problem is it is not written well, and no refrencing. Should have ]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Albums and songs-related deletion discussions. — • Gene93k (talk) 17:17, 30 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep or merge. I added a couple of links to album reviews and an explanatory note, and put the track listings into their own section. Not really sure if it merits its own freestanding page, or merger into the first compilation's page--certainly many or all of the artists on the record are notable: Willie Nelson, Dar Williams, George Clinton, etc. Page was only created 9/30, so it might be nice to give the original author a chance to build it up a bit more. Either way, I'm willing to move contents over if "merge" is the decision, but only if that's the decision. Can anyone tell me what normal procedure is in that case? --Hobbes Goodyear (talk) 00:39, 2 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Relistedto generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
- Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Ron Ritzman (talk) 00:00, 7 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep - Album features original contributions by notable artists including ]
- Delete fails ]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.