Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Henrik Gottlieb

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. Star Mississippi 03:11, 14 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Henrik Gottlieb

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

A translator and undoubtedly a fine one at that, but no WP:SIGCOV presented and no WP:GNG notability. He was a translator and a teacher, but that doth not WP:GNG pass. Alexandermcnabb (talk) 10:22, 6 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: News media, Television, and Denmark. Alexandermcnabb (talk) 10:22, 6 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Academics and educators-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 10:30, 6 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Keep. I'm seeing quite a few highly cited work in what I believe to be a medium-to-low citation field. I think it's enough for
WP:NPROF C8, if it could be backed by a reference (I did not quickly succeed; contrary to what is in the article, his CV lists dates of 2006-2011 for Chief Editor of Perspectives). Russ Woodroofe (talk) 10:50, 6 June 2022 (UTC)[reply
]

Keep meets
WP:NPROF #1 and #8 criterion. Samanthany (talk) 00:43, 9 June 2022 (UTC)[reply
]

Keep. Not a field I know at all but appears highly cited in Google Scholar (410,366,284,190,170; total of 8 papers >100 citations). The editor-in-chief position is also potentially notability conferring. Espresso Addict (talk) 13:51, 9 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this page.