Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Henrik Norby

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep.

WP:SNOW. A {{Trout}} for the nominator for claiming that "an Olympian is notable" is "wikilawyering". The Bushranger _{One ping only} 00:09, 5 April 2014 (UTC)[reply

]

Henrik Norby

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Notability only established in the most Wikilawyering sense in that the subject competed in the Olympics. Article contains too little content to be of any value. Robert McClenon (talk) 02:26, 4 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

a. That's not wikilawyering--that's our guidelines. b. what matters not so much is what the article has: what counts is the subject in general. Drmies (talk) 02:33, 4 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Olympians are
in general considered notable enough to have an article. As the good doctor has stated, (article) size doesn't matter. --kelapstick^(bainuu) 02:42, 4 April 2014 (UTC)[reply
]

Keep per
WP:ATHLETE] - "The guidelines on this page are intended to reflect the fact that sports figures are likely to meet Wikipedia's basic standards of inclusion if they have, for example, participated in a major international amateur or professional competition at the highest level (such as the Olympics)." Lugnuts ^{Dick Laurent is dead} 06:45, 4 April 2014 (UTC)[reply
]

Keep per notability of those who appear in the Olympic Games. If the nominator wishes to modify that, this isn't the way to do it. As for "Article contains too little content to be of any value", perhaps the nominator is not aware of the concept of a "
stub"? The Rambling Man (talk) 06:55, 4 April 2014 (UTC)[reply
]

Keep per notability as an Olympian. Northern Antarctica (₵) 14:35, 4 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this page.