Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Henry David Montgomery, 3rd Viscount Montgomery of Alamein

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was redirect to Viscount Montgomery of Alamein. Sandstein 18:44, 26 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Henry David Montgomery, 3rd Viscount Montgomery of Alamein

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

A7 declined on the basis that "Contesting A7: the subject claims to be a descendant of notable relatives"/ .

I do not consider that a credible claim of significance , and there is nothing else. DGG ( talk ) 04:51, 19 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Delete, genealogycruft. Geschichte (talk) 07:52, 19 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of England-related deletion discussions. Spiderone 09:50, 19 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per
WP:NOTINHERITED Spiderone 09:50, 19 October 2020 (UTC)[reply
]

Delete. Had the peerage been inherited
notable politician, but as it is, no notability has been inherited. --Paul ❬talk❭ 12:23, 19 October 2020 (UTC)[reply
]

Redirect to
WP:ATD-R, where the subject is mentioned, may be appropriate here. -- Dps04 (talk) 10:08, 20 October 2020 (UTC)[reply
]

Redirect per
WP:NOTINHERITED. Tips of the hat to Dps04, Paul Carpenter, and DGG. Bearian (talk) 21:48, 20 October 2020 (UTC)[reply
]

Redirect to
TheRedDomitor (talk) 17:34, 26 October 2020 (UTC)[reply
]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this page.