Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Hermione Way (2nd nomination)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Consensus is that she is not yet notable. Star Mississippi 14:49, 15 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hermione Way

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Non-notable. Dubious sources JMHamo (talk) 17:13, 7 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Women-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 17:59, 7 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Journalism-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 17:59, 7 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the [[Wikipedia:WikiProject Deletion

sorting/California|list of California-related deletion discussions]]. Shellwood (talk) 17:59, 7 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Keep I've done some work on the article and I think it now shows significant coverage in reliable sources. Mujinga (talk) 18:28, 7 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Trivial coverage is not enough to show notability JMHamo (talk) 19:16, 7 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

I wouldn't say the two Megan Rose Dickey articles in Business Insider and the VentureBeat article are trivial mentions. Mujinga (talk) 14:25, 8 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per nominator. Appreciate the work being put into it by Mujinga, but I just don't think this person is notable. ~Junedude433 (talk) 04:43, 8 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per nom, not notable per
WP:GNG. W C M_email 08:28, 8 December 2021 (UTC)[reply
]

Delete. Having just one small part in a show does not make you notable enough for a Wikipedia article. Article is poorly formatted and not much reliable sources. HelpingWorld (talk) 04:49, 15 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Delete: Thanks for your efforts, Mujinga, but considering that
WP:SIGCOV. A Google news search does not generate enough information to write a full article about the subject. Heartmusic678 (talk) 14:31, 15 December 2021 (UTC)[reply
]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this page.