Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Hero Glamour

Source: Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Courcelles 06:13, 7 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hero Glamour

Hero Glamour (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Poorly sourced promotional article about a product. There are a few very brief media mentions in article about the company, but no in depth coverage that I could locate. Fails WP:GNG. - MrX 13:18, 30 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. Evano1van(எவனோ ஓருவன்) 13:44, 30 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete. Too promotional. Can be recreated if someone rewrites it to be more neutral and adds sources. I don't see anything obvious in a Google search. NinjaRobotPirate (talk) 14:13, 30 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete Fails GNG, promo piece.LM2000 (talk) 17:21, 30 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 23:06, 30 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Transportation-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 23:06, 30 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this page.