Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Hertz Nazaire

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's

talk page or in a deletion review

). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 06:05, 15 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hertz Nazaire

Hertz Nazaire (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log | edits since nomination)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

does not meet criteria for visual artists -- no works in museums, no substantial coverage DGG ( talk ) 18:13, 17 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

• Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Caribbean-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 18:57, 17 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]
• Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Authors-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 18:58, 17 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]
• Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Haiti-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 18:58, 17 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]
• Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Artists-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 18:58, 17 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]
• Note: This discussion has been included in the list of New York-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 18:59, 17 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]
• Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Connecticut-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 19:00, 17 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]
• Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Arts-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 19:02, 17 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]
• Comment not notable as a painter for the reasons in the nom, but possibly as sickle cell activist? Found and added two sources on that, but not yet sure it's enough hence comment. Will keep looking Star Mississippi 19:36, 17 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, RL0919 (talk) 18:44, 24 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Bungle ^{(talk • contribs)} 19:01, 31 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

• Mild Keep He's mentioned in a paragraph in a USA Today article, and Conneticut paper and in MIT and Univ of Conneticut newspapers. He's gotten a bit of traction. I also find a few paragraphs about him in Google Scholar, in a book [1]. I think he passes notability tests. Oaktree b (talk) 20:53, 31 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete no substantial coverage. "mentions in 2 newspapers and 2 student papers" are mentions, , not substantial coverage. The "few paragraphs" in a book, are each 2 short sentences long. That's not substantial coverage. . "He's gotten a bit of traction." is pretty much the definition of Not Yet Notable. ` DGG ( talk ) 21:19, 2 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

  DGG, just a heads up since there have been multiple relists and this was a while ago, you're the nom here. Star Mississippi 22:40, 2 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

• Mild delete Gusfriend (talk) 02:55, 5 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

WP:GNG?
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, — Coffee // have a ☕️ // beans // 06:51, 8 February 2022 (UTC)[reply

]