Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Highervisibility

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's

talk page or in a deletion review

). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. NorthAmerica¹⁰⁰⁰ 23:31, 23 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Highervisibility

Highervisibility (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Unimportant company. Does not meet WP:COMPANY. CerealKillerYum (talk) 05:17, 9 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Tennessee-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 02:50, 10 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 02:50, 10 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Internet-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 02:50, 10 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete This is a run-of-the-mill
  search engine optimization shop which has won a non-notable industry back-scratching award. It isn't notable as Wikipedia defines it. Cullen³²⁸ Let's discuss it 06:31, 16 December 2014 (UTC)[reply
  ]

• Delete per Cullen - non-notable SEO. –Davey2010 ^{Merry Xmas / Happy New Year} 23:09, 23 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's

talk page or in a deletion review

). No further edits should be made to this page.