Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Himani Dalmia

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep.

(non-admin closure) —UY Scuti ^Talk 18:44, 13 February 2016 (UTC)[reply

]

Himani Dalmia

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Doesn't meet

WP:GNG Boleyn (talk) 21:18, 22 January 2016 (UTC)[reply

]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, —UY Scuti ^Talk 17:25, 29 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

delete fails GNG CerealKillerYum (talk) 17:31, 29 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. Musa^Talk ☻ 21:16, 29 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Authors-related deletion discussions. Musa^Talk ☻ 21:16, 29 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. Musa^Talk ☻ 21:16, 29 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Keep.Delete at best for now perhaps as there's nothing to better assume WP:CREATIVE yet. SwisterTwister talk 05:15, 30 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Strong Keep I removed all of the unsourced material and then rewrote the article, adding sources. She is covered in multiple reliable sources, several of them completely about her. She passes GNG. The book made it to bestseller status in India. Megalibrarygirl (talk) 15:32, 5 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: As the article and sourcing have been substantially changed (by Megalibrarygirl) following all but the last comment here, I'd like to see other editors look at the sourcing as it now stands. joe decker ^talk 00:42, 6 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, joe decker ^talk 00:42, 6 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Keep Kudos to
WP:HEY.E.M.Gregory (talk) 22:11, 10 February 2016 (UTC)[reply
]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this page.