Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Hojamal Ho

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. --

Hojamal Ho

• Strong Delete. To me it seems like a non-sence article. Google search does generate a few example of this term being used in very selected forums as a part of casual vocabulary - but it does not appear to be anything more than a swear-word introduce by a group of school friends. Further more the context may be offensive for some people. The terms - "ponda", "ganda", "ponge" and "ponga" are all taboo
  buttock. - Arman Aziz 06:17, 27 January 2007 (UTC)[reply
  ]
• Delete. Certainloy interesting but non notable --froth^T 07:08, 27 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete. No assertion of
  Wikipedia is not for things made up in school one day. --JaimeLesMaths ^(talk!edits) 09:35, 27 January 2007 (UTC)[reply
  ]
• Delete. As per reasons stated already Devious Viper 10:22, 27 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete,
  WP:NFT, nonsense. Terence Ong 17:13, 27 January 2007 (UTC)[reply
  ]
• Delete per
  Wikipedia:Wikipedia is not censored, so offensiveness is not a valid point to bring up in AfD. cab 23:36, 27 January 2007 (UTC)[reply
  ]

Thanks cab. Please note - use of taboo words was not "the reason" for proposing to delete the article, I just tried to point out that in addition to being non-sense the article also possibly violates

Wikipedia:Profanity. -Arman Aziz 03:32, 28 January 2007 (UTC)[reply

]

• Delete. Inadequate references. WMMartin 14:02, 29 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.