Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Honor Club

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's

talk page or in a deletion review

). No further edits should be made to this page.

Honor Club

Honor Club (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

no evidence that it is yet notable. DGG ( talk ) 00:18, 4 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

• Keep Granted, I'm the one who just created it, but ROH just officially announced it two days ago. Give it some time to build up, construct it similar to WWE Network's page. Jgera5 (talk) 13:51, 4 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the

missfortune 01:42, 5 February 2018 (UTC)[reply

]

Note: This discussion has been included in the

missfortune 01:42, 5 February 2018 (UTC)[reply

]

Note: This discussion has been included in the

missfortune 01:42, 5 February 2018 (UTC)[reply

]

• Keep - Although I can understand the
  WP:TOOSOON arguments. This is arguably the second largest promotion in the US and a major platform for them. If this were deleted it would only be recreated in a few weeks. - Galatz^Talk 14:45, 5 February 2018 (UTC)[reply
  ]
• Draft-ify -
  WP:GNG. Nikki♥311 20:39, 5 February 2018 (UTC)[reply
  ]
• Delete until such time as multiple, reliable, independent mainstream news sources cover this product which does not yet even have a launch date. ŞůṜīΣĻ¹98¹^Speak 01:49, 6 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep Article will expand in time but there's enough out there right now to pass GNG.[1][2][3][4]LM2000 (talk) 08:36, 6 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

• Keep,
  WP:TOOSOON only applies to subjects that are promising but are not notable now, but plenty of sources report on it. --Donald Trung (Talk) (Articles) 06:42, 11 February 2018 (UTC)[reply
  ]

• Keep very notable.--Runnel tunnel (talk) 07:14, 14 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

• Keep sourcing makes a good point towards notability. CBS and otherwise Lee Vilenski ^{(talk • contribs)} 09:56, 16 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's

talk page or in a deletion review

). No further edits should be made to this page.