Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Honorable cnote

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Mark Arsten (talk) 15:21, 2 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Honorable cnote

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Promotional article for a record producer of questionable notability. A Google news search on "Honorable cnote" shows only 9 results, with no significant coverage from reliable sources - primarily passing mentions. Standard search shows a lot of social media and YouTube, little significant coverage from independent reliable sources. MikeWazowski (talk) 18:41, 12 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 00:41, 13 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Note: The article has been copied to userspace at User:Cakeupboy1/sandbox without attribution. The userspace version needs to have its attribution fixed consistent with the outcome of this discussion. (templated, histmerged, or deleted) Monty ₈₄₅ 16:14, 13 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted
to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, TheSpecialUser ^TSU 00:18, 19 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted
to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Mark Arsten (talk) 00:06, 26 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Zero cites, has some bare external links listed as "references". Upon quick review, none appear suitable for wp:notability. North8000 (talk) 02:32, 26 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Weak delete This seems like decent coverage to me. He also seems to be mentioned in this book, but in what capacity I am not sure. I don't think this is sufficient by itself. I couldn't find anything else, but if someone else can, or has access to the book, please let me know. I am open to changing my mind.
bot!) 05:04, 26 August 2012 (UTC)[reply
]

Delete as per the nomination.--Juristicweb (talk) 18:28, 26 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this page.