Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Hospitality Financial and Technology Professionals

Source: Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Missvain (talk) 16:42, 8 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hospitality Financial and Technology Professionals

Hospitality Financial and Technology Professionals (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

This is a promotional web page about a non-notable organization. Every reference is either a mere note, or from the organization, or related sources, or trade sources that publish promotional material. DGG ( talk ) 11:50, 23 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Organizations-related deletion discussions. Spiderone(Talk to Spider) 13:07, 23 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Texas-related deletion discussions. Spiderone(Talk to Spider) 13:07, 23 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Finance-related deletion discussions. North America1000 18:11, 23 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Technology-related deletion discussions. North America1000 18:11, 23 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. North America1000 18:12, 23 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, plicit 12:31, 30 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete. Even if the organization were notable (and I'm not seeing that), the content here is so refbombed with PR fluff that a
    WP:TNT would be warranted. --Kinu t/c 19:03, 2 May 2021 (UTC)[reply
    ]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's ). No further edits should be made to this page.