Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Hostal Yebisah, Santa Eulària des Riu

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. If anyone wants to Transwiki the page I would be happy to userfy it to them. J04n(talk page) 11:14, 4 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hostal Yebisah, Santa Eulària des Riu

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

advertising The Banner talk 01:34, 26 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Trans-wiki to Wikivoyage and Delete - basically a brochure for a nice but otherwise non-
notable hotel. Stalwart111 02:02, 26 March 2013 (UTC)[reply
]

Strong Keep This small hotel is notable because it is one of the oldest hotels in this town being built just after world war two. I agree that it needs more work to bring it more in line with the standard hotel type article but deleting it is just a very unhelpful direction for this article. Wikivoyager is a complete waste of time at the moment,You can't find your way around the pages at all well at the moment and I can see it disappearing into oblivion eventually!!! stavros1 ♣ 07:42, 26 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

I think what it needs is a few good sources that allow it to meet

WP:GNG. If you have some, I'm sure people would be happy to consider them. I'm happy for it not to be transwikied; I only suggested as much because I thought someone might like to preserve their work. Stalwart111 08:18, 26 March 2013 (UTC)[reply

]

The way the article is now, it will disappear in oblivion on ENWP too. The Banner talk 11:24, 26 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The above is Very Un-called for comment and unhelpful, This editor should consider Wikipedia:Civility if they wish to make a positive contribution to this disscussion. stavros1 ♣ 13:07, 26 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Bad Attitude If any Editor would like further proof of this editors bad attitude and bad language look at the answer given Here stavros1 ♣ 13:32, 26 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Aha, you are out of useful arguments so you get personal. Point taken, you loose. The Banner talk 16:05, 26 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Spain-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 13:43, 26 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 13:43, 26 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Wikipedia is
WP:N have not been identified. Wikipedia guidelines for notability do not grant inherent notability to something just because it is "the oldest (or newest, or largest, or smallest, or shiniest) in its town." Edison (talk) 14:14, 26 March 2013 (UTC)[reply
]

Delete, fails
WP:GNG. Jezhotwells (talk) 12:51, 27 March 2013 (UTC)[reply
]

Move This article should be Trans-wiki to Wikivoyage it content would be more appropriate on its own page there. Cheeseladder (talk) 07:54, 30 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this page.