Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Hot Cross (2nd nomination)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. Nominator withdrew and no other !votes except keep.

(non-admin closure) Bungle ^{(talk • contribs)} 20:46, 27 February 2021 (UTC)[reply

]

Hot Cross

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Can't find any

WP:RS on this band Rolf H Nelson (talk) 03:48, 19 February 2021 (UTC)[reply

]
Withdrawn by nominator: additional sources found; withdrawing as no other commenters have appeared to endorse deletion. Rolf H Nelson (talk) 20:23, 27 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 04:50, 19 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Pennsylvania-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 04:50, 19 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Comment - I didn't realize that this article had already gone through AfD before I submitted it via Twinkle. Not sure what to do, I guess I'll just let the process proceed, which will probably end in 'keep' since I don't have any additional reasons for deletion beyond what the first AfD had. Rolf H Nelson (talk) 02:37, 21 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

@Rolf h nelson: The previous AfD was back in 2006 so cannot be considered relevant to this discussion. I see from your other comment you may now be doubting whether to keep the AfD running or not, at you have opted to find and assign some sources yourself? I was pondering a relist, but I sense you may also be considering withdrawing the nomination? Bungle ^{(talk • contribs)} 16:16, 26 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

@Bungle: Yes, good idea. Rolf H Nelson (talk) 20:23, 27 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Comment - I've added a couple of sources (AllMusic bio and a Stylus album review), though I doubt it'd be enough to establish notability CiphriusKane (talk) 04:55, 19 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The Stylus review is a good find, I hadn't found it when I did my pre-AfD search. Rolf H Nelson (talk) 02:37, 21 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

There's a few more bits, like an AllMusic review, a PunkNews review, and this PunkNews article. The PN review looks user-submitted though (attributed to sk8punx4evr, which looks like a user handle) and the PN article looks like a rehashed press release, even if it was written by the site's founder CiphriusKane (talk) 07:44, 21 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Keep as they have an AllMusic staff written bio and two staff written album reviews as well as Punk News and others linked on the article so that
WP:GNG is passed and deletion is unnecessary in my view, Atlantic306 (talk) 01:25, 25 February 2021 (UTC)[reply
]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this page.