Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Hotel Nikko Palau

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Nomination withdrawn. LibStar (talk) 10:37, 11 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hotel Nikko Palau

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

fails WP:ORG. simply being an old hotel is not a claim for notability. the only coverage I could find is in hotel and tourist listings. LibStar (talk) 00:19, 23 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. Northamerica1000^(talk) 16:03, 23 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Oceania-related deletion discussions. Northamerica1000^(talk) 16:03, 23 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Keep, quite a few google book results, including mentions like "Until the Palau Pacific Resort went up in 1984, Palau's top hotel was the Hotel Nikko Palau" ([1]) and " Palau Continental Hotel, Palau's best tourist hotel." ([2]). The hotel was previously known as 'Palau Continental Hotel'. There is more details that could easily be added, like how it was set up by Japan Airlines and about the workers strike in the 1970s (which came to involve 2 US congressmen). --Soman (talk) 00:41, 24 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Keep per Soman above. 0x0077BE (talk) 18:16, 10 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Architecture-related deletion discussions. Necrothesp (talk) 15:01, 24 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted
to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Mark Arsten (talk) 04:50, 30 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted
to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Northamerica1000^(talk) 13:00, 10 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Keep' Sufficiently notable hotel, as shown by the references. 'DGG (at NYPL)' (talk) 20:14, 10 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this page.