Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/How to be an excellent cna

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was snow delete, with a round of applause for Madison-chan's comment.

Bencherlite^Talk 16:31, 16 November 2011 (UTC)[reply

]

How to be an excellent cna

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Wikipedia is

not for posting your homework essay. Had been prod'ed, prod removed by page creator. Syrthiss (talk) 14:54, 16 November 2011 (UTC)[reply

]

Delete per nom - original research / essay. andy (talk) 14:58, 16 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Original article included a class assignment header including the authors name, course name, and assignment date. Clearly this is a homework assignment. Removal of the assignment header does not address the fact that this is a pure essay, not an encyclopedia article. WikiDan61^ChatMe!_ReadMe!! 15:04, 16 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - Wikipedia is not a place to post homework assigments, in fact it's one of the WORST places to post homework assigments as other people can edit them and possibly get you a lower grade. --Madison-chan (talk) 15:08, 16 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Yet another example of why we need a "blatant
WP:NOT violation" CSD criteria. —Tom Morris (talk) 15:11, 16 November 2011 (UTC)[reply
]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Medicine-related deletion discussions. —Tom Morris (talk) 15:14, 16 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. I'm beginning to see one root of the problem. The only discursive writing most people do today is for school assignments with assigned page length and word count requirements. This encourages bad habits. - Smerdis of Tlön - killing the human spirit since 2003! 15:49, 16 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Snow delete as an obvious violation of
WP:NOT. --MelanieN (talk) 15:51, 16 November 2011 (UTC)[reply
]

Delete as above. Jab843 (talk) 15:57, 16 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - with extreme prejudice. NickCT (talk) 15:59, 16 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.