Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Howard Brodsky

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. 78.26 _{(spin me / revolutions)} 21:18, 7 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Howard Brodsky

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

zero notability outside of his companies (they are the same company, one owns the other) . DGG ( talk ) 20:36, 31 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of New Hampshire-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 21:01, 31 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Businesspeople-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 21:01, 31 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Comment: I have proposed changes for adding new sources such as Telegraph, EY Hall of Fame, Union Leader, Bloomberg, INC, Business NH agasine etc to establish notability. Please refer the article's talk page - https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Talk:Howard_Brodsky

TP495 (talk) 20:10, 3 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - It's not surprising he gets some mentions in the press, but coverage is shallow and always in the context of his companies. Not independently notable. Hugsyrup (talk) 12:26, 7 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this page.