Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Hybrid (2007 film)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep.

(non-admin closure) Juliette Han (talk) 10:10, 10 June 2020 (UTC)[reply

]

Hybrid (2007 film)

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

This article about a made-for-TV movie has no sources beyond links to IMDB and the production company's website, and the movie does not meet any of the criteria of

WP:NFILM. RL0919 (talk) 17:57, 27 May 2020 (UTC)[reply

]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Science fiction and fantasy-related deletion discussions. RL0919 (talk) 17:57, 27 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Film-related deletion discussions. RL0919 (talk) 17:57, 27 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Keep — Seems to be notable enough. There are source available online including: The Werewolf Filmography: 300+ Movies Indie Horrors! The Not-To-Be-Missed, The Acceptable, and The Forgettable Encyclopedia of Television Film Directors Hybrid (DVD). ~~ CAPTAIN MEDUSA^talk 18:11, 27 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]
The Encyclopedia of Television Film Directors only lists the movie as one of the director's films, which is just a passing mention. Horror.com is a fansite. So I don't think either of those contributes anything to notability. The first two might. --RL0919 (talk) 18:26, 27 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Keep I believe that CAPTAIN MEDUSA sources make it pass GNG.
talk) 14:04, 4 June 2020 (UTC)[reply
]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Sandstein 18:14, 4 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Keep per
WP:ARTN says that the current poor quality of the article does not detract from the subject's notability. — Toughpigs (talk) 18:59, 4 June 2020 (UTC)[reply
]

Keep as reliable book sources have been identified and added to the article so that
WP:GNG is passed and deletion is no longer necessary, imv Atlantic306 (talk) 21:34, 7 June 2020 (UTC)[reply
]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this page.