Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Hyperion Hotel
Source: Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was keep.
► 11:35, 10 January 2007 (UTC)[reply
]
Hyperion Hotel
- )
- Delete as fancruft, fails to claim notabilty, also WP:CITE to name a few KnightLago 22:41, 3 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep Notability is as part of a notable show, WP:NOT doesn't exclude places in a TV show, feel free to tag with unreferenced if you want. I wouldn't oppose a merger to a single page though. FrozenPurpleCube 23:32, 3 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep - this is not just another random 'place in a TV show', but an important location that appears in many many episodes, in a very notable show. it is impractical to delete all location articles related to TV series just because some might like to see a Wikipedia that ignores popular culture. ]
- This article fails to claim notability in anyway. From Wikipedia's no original research policy, as the only place this information comes from is original research. I agree that this is not the Encyclopedia Britannica, and I welcome popular culture, but, only popular culture that is verifiable and not involving original research. Again, all of the above arguments have focused on the notability of the show and not this hotel, which the article is about. KnightLago 00:45, 4 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Sources are available on Angel and Buffy. For example, a regularly produced magazine, which has had articles on the Hyperion Hotel. I'd add them as references if I knew what issues, but I'm sure somebody has them. And here: [1]. A first-party documentary enough for you? FrozenPurpleCube 14:53, 4 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Those are a great start. Use them in the article. Remove all the WP:NOR as they stand. KnightLago 16:42, 4 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- I'd try but I haven't seen the documentary, and I'm not going to buy a DVD set just to update an article on a DVD series. Or hunt down some old magazines. I'll just hope somebody at the the Buffyverse Wikiproject will take up the job. But the fact is, they can, thus I see no reason to delete. FrozenPurpleCube 18:22, 4 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- I will be able to help out in this regard, I have access to the mags/DVDs. To start with, I'll add this text:
- "Angel Investigations found a new base from the episode, "]
- I will be able to help out in this regard, I have access to the mags/DVDs. To start with, I'll add this text:
- I'd try but I haven't seen the documentary, and I'm not going to buy a DVD set just to update an article on a DVD series. Or hunt down some old magazines. I'll just hope somebody at the the
- Those are a great start. Use them in the article. Remove all the
- Sources are available on Angel and Buffy. For example, a regularly produced magazine, which has had articles on the Hyperion Hotel. I'd add them as references if I knew what issues, but I'm sure somebody has them. And here: [1]. A first-party documentary enough for you? FrozenPurpleCube 14:53, 4 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- This article fails to claim notability in anyway. From
- Keep I don't see KnightLago's logic in putting Buffy fictional locations up for deletion when he's updating the page for Central Perk, the fictional coffee shop on Friends. Why is Central Perk treated differently? Static Universe 07:45, 4 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Because if you read the above comment by Central Perk. I went to Central Perk and tried to see what sources I could find before I nominated it for deletion. I found a few so I cited them. I am still thinking about nominating the article and the other places in the friends universe when this ends. You are attacking me and my edits because you can not find a logical reason to keep this article or the others in the face of Wikipedia policy. KnightLago 13:19, 4 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Because if you read the above comment by
- Delete as not notable. If it is notable in the Buffyverse then give it an article at the Buffy Wiki or the Buffy Wikia. In this universe, it is a set in some studio. --maclean 07:28, 4 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep - These locations are notable as crucial locations in super-notable series. But improve them by citing where information is coming from (e.g. footnotes on episodes). - Buffyverse 04:28, 6 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep as per general precedent regarding notable fictional places in literature, movies, and television. --MCB 07:19, 6 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.