Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Iñaki Berenguer
Source: Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was no consensus with leave to speedy renominate. Ron Ritzman (talk) 23:57, 31 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Iñaki Berenguer
- Iñaki Berenguer (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
On the face of it this looks like a reasonable referenced article, but looking deeper there doesn't seem to be significant coverage in reliable sources. Most of the sources are not independent, and those that are, aren't about him, but his company. And sorry if this might sound like bad faith, but I find it rather surprising that the user who started this article managed to do so with their very first edit, and with perfectly formatted references.
talk) 21:32, 11 January 2011 (UTC)[reply
]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Businesspeople-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 16:41, 12 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.]
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 06:23, 18 January 2011 (UTC)[reply
- Keep Looking beyond present sources, a superficial search locates mention in Wall Street Journal [1], in El País. The extent to which is it about him or his company involves subjective judgement, and certainly more searching. Should it be a serious problem a merge might be relevant, to the company - which also is loose-hand carpet-bombed tagged for Notability despite multiple sources. MrCleanOut (talk) 11:06, 19 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.]
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Ron Ritzman (talk) 03:26, 25 January 2011 (UTC)[reply - The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.