Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/I-SPARSH Scheme

Source: Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was soft delete‎. Based on

"soft deletion"). Editors can request the article's undeletion. Liz Read! Talk! 07:31, 6 November 2023 (UTC)[reply
]

I-SPARSH Scheme

I-SPARSH Scheme (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log | edits since nomination)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

This is a piece of political propaganda that lacks independent notability.

talk) 15:00, 27 October 2023 (UTC)[reply
]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Maliner (talk) 19:36, 3 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

  • Delete: Zero coverage in Gnews that I can find and the article is hard to understand, appears to be a poor translation of the native language prose. Oaktree b (talk) 20:19, 3 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this page.