Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/IOCOM

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's

talk page or in a deletion review

). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Stifle (talk) 14:04, 14 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

IOCOM (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Standard searches did not reveal any significant coverage in independent reliable sources. Many press releases,

• Delete: per nom, a search just turns up more of the same. Vrac (talk) 13:45, 30 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Software-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 18:51, 30 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 18:51, 30 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Illinois-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 18:51, 30 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete for now and draft/userfy if needed as my searches found nothing particularly good with the best being here and here. SwisterTwister talk 05:54, 2 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete. Coverage seems to be non-RS, press releases, advertorial, and the like. If better sourcing can be found, now or in future, then would reconsider. --Hobbes Goodyear (talk)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's

talk page or in a deletion review

). No further edits should be made to this page.