Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/ITunes Originals – 3 Doors Down

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. As stated, absolutely no secondary coverage again. I suppose it could be listed in the artists' article, but it's not a sufficiently useful redirect to keep Black Kite 20:06, 1 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

ITunes Originals – 3 Doors Down

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

I can't find significant coverage for this

talk) 14:34, 18 October 2009 (UTC)[reply

]

Delete for lack of secondary sources; absolutely none exist. Ten Pound Hammer, his otters and a clue-bat • ⁽Many otters • One bat • One hammer) 15:41, 18 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Albums and songs-related deletion discussions. -- Ron Ritzman (talk) 23:01, 24 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Ron Ritzman (talk) 00:03, 25 October 2009 (UTC)[reply

]

Keep as with other nominated iTunes Originals album, this is an album by a notable artist which includes a number of charting songs, and since the band's other albums have their own articles it strikes me as counterproductive to exclude this one. Contains Mild Peril (talk) 02:53, 28 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Delete for the same reasons this was deleted. I can't find any significant coverage in reliable sources, with this and this bringing up nothing reliable. Notability is not inherited. Just because a compilation album contains versions of charting songs that were already released, it doesn't mean it's notable. That would be similar to saying a cover band is notable because it plays covers of popular songs. The bottom line is that there is no significant coverage in reliable sources, and that fact alone makes the album not notable. Tim meh 23:36, 30 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.