Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/I Live for the Day

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. No clear evidence that MuzeTunes is notable, and as that's the only chart it's charted on, it fails NSONG. Ged UK 09:47, 20 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I Live for the Day

)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

No notable charts, no awards, no cover versions. Fails

WP:BADCHARTS is an exhaustive list of every bad chart. Given that I pretty much compiled that list, I can assure the world that it is far from being a comprehensive list of every bad chart. —Kww(talk) 01:00, 12 April 2010 (UTC)[reply

]

MuzeTunes is a subsidiary of the Billboard Hot 100, just like the Bubbling Under Hot 100 chart. I guess we'll have to delete every single song that has only charted on the Bubbling Under Hot 100 since MuzeTunes isn't allowed either. The song doesn't need a cover version or awards to be a single. MTV even released a review statement about the song. It even has cover art for the single. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 24.73.2.125 (talk) 02:18, 12 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - No notable charting. Being a single doesn't make it notable. Fails
talk) 02:21, 12 April 2010 (UTC)[reply
]

Do Not Delete - It doesn't fail
WP:NSONG. It says to be a notable single, it needs to have charted on a national or a significant chart. It has charted on the MuzeTunes chart, which is, in turn, part of the Billboard Hot 100, a significant chart. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Mr.Chicago (talk) 02:18, 12 April 2010 (UTC) —Preceding unsigned comment added by 24.73.2.125 (talk) [reply
]

What support do you have for your belief that MuzeTunes is a part of the Billboard Hot 100? Showing up at Billboard.biz doesn't mean that it's even a Billboard chart: they publish some foreign and proprietary charts in every issue, and MuzeTunes appears to be an extremely minor proprietary chart.—Kww(talk) 02:59, 12 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Comment - MuzeTunes is a streaming service. The "chart" is a listing of the most streamed songs on that service. Clearly not a "national or significant chart". -
talk) 03:05, 12 April 2010 (UTC)[reply
]

Actually, given the description I quoted in the nomination, I'm not even sure it's that: it may just count the number of times people listened to a short sample to decide whether to buy the whole song.—Kww(talk) 03:08, 12 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Instead, some of the information about the single should be redirected to a section about the singles on the A Little More Personal (Raw) page. I'm planning on expanding the page soon.— Preceding unsigned comment added by 24.73.2.125 (talk • contribs)

Note – For three days, the AfD tag has not been displayed on the article. I restored it just now. Paul Erik ^{(talk)(contribs)} 03:53, 20 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I'm planning on expanding the A Little More Personal (Raw) page soon. I have done numerous edits and revisions to Lohan's previous album, Speak. I'm going to try and make A Little More Personal look like that page as well. I think that we should remove this delete tag until I edit the A Little More Personal and add some of the information there. Once I've added the information, delete the page.Travismullins1996(talk) 12:11, 20 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.