Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/IceChat

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's

talk page or in a deletion review

). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete‎. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 04:05, 29 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

IceChat

IceChat (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log | edits since nomination)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Posted to the wrong daily log page.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 19:59, 18 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Consider this a First Relist as the previous one was just to move the discussion to the correct daily log page. Not eligible for Soft Deletion.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 21:24, 25 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete: Other than download links, this is the best I can find [1], which is at least from a RS, but it's still a download link. I don't see enough coverage for GNG. Oaktree b (talk) 22:33, 25 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
• Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Internet and Software. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 22:41, 25 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete Fails
  WP:GNG.--DanikS88 (talk) 11:27, 27 March 2024 (UTC)[reply
  ]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.