Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Imaginary Friend (film)
Appearance
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was keep. Geschichte (talk) 08:14, 25 June 2021 (UTC)
Imaginary Friend (film)
[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!
- Imaginary Friend (film) (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Non-notable film, does not have significant coverage, does not meet
]- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Film-related deletion discussions. – Lord Bolingbroke (talk) 05:04, 16 June 2021 (UTC)
- Keep One review cited in article, and another at Radio Times [[1]] Donaldd23 (talk) 11:31, 16 June 2021 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Television-related deletion discussions. North America1000 06:57, 17 June 2021 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions. North America1000 06:57, 17 June 2021 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, 78.26 (spin me / revolutions) 01:59, 23 June 2021 (UTC)
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, 78.26 (spin me / revolutions) 01:59, 23 June 2021 (UTC)
- Keep per Donaldd23 above. I would also like to note that bold enough to do so. Sean Stephens (talk) 03:20, 23 June 2021 (UTC)]
- Keep, but I must say this is narrow. Two reviews are the minimum set by WP:NF, and I'd hardly call that Radio Times one a "]
full-length review
". However, I have (via imdb) also found this review by The Movie Scene, which brings the count to two and a half reviews. Acceptable, imo. --LordPeterII (talk) 18:59, 23 June 2021 (UTC) - KeepThere are IMDB article for the Movie and 53% of the AUDIENCE SCORE on the Rotten Tomato, so what the measurement for the Non-notablity? I think the article has its minimum standard in order to keep Thrago (talk) 02:48, 25 June 2021 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.