Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/In the Presence of Enemies
Appearance
Source: Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia.
![]() | This discussion was subject to a deletion review on 2011 March 30. For an explanation of the process, see Wikipedia:Deletion review. |
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was REDIRECT. postdlf (talk) 05:25, 30 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]
In the Presence of Enemies
- )
- )
- )
- )
A couple of years ago, we successfully cleaned up the proliferation of articles on individual Dream Theater songs, merging all but a few of them into their parent articles per
WP:NSONGS. See, e.g., [1]
[2]. In particular, several forks from the album WP:LAW } 18:11, 6 March 2011 (UTC)[reply
]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Albums and songs-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 14:13, 8 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.]
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Ron Ritzman (talk) 00:01, 13 March 2011 (UTC)[reply
- Redirect. As much as I love Dream Theater, it's no secret that their individual songs really don't receive much attention from conventional media sources. As such, articles about their individual songs will most likely consist entirely of original research (as some of these already do). --Cryptic C62 · Talk 15:02, 22 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.]
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Stifle (talk) 20:51, 22 March 2011 (UTC)[reply
- Comment Nominators, please take more care in future to remove the underlining from the titles of articles copy-pasted from the URL, so as to not give the impression that the actual title of the article is flawed. Anarchangel (talk) 10:27, 25 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.