Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Index of articles related to terms of service and privacy policies
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. If anyone wants this restored and moved to a WikiProject as suggested in this discussion, let me know. Liz Read! Talk! 23:50, 14 July 2023 (UTC)
[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!
- Index of articles related to terms of service and privacy policies (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log | edits since nomination)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
This article is purportedly an
WP:LISTN. Most of the article links aren't even to articles regarding ToS or privacy policies, either; they just link to a section in a website's/service's article. The links to full articles are only tangentially related. SWinxy (talk) 03:20, 1 July 2023 (UTC)
]
- Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Law, Internet, and Websites. SWinxy (talk) 03:20, 1 July 2023 (UTC)
- Delete per WP:NOTDIRECTORY. WeirdNAnnoyed (talk) 15:35, 1 July 2023 (UTC)]
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Relisting, not eligible for Soft Deletion due to Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Index of Articles Relating to Terms of Service and Privacy Policies
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Liz Read! Talk! 03:19, 8 July 2023 (UTC)
- Delete: agree with nominator and with what was said by WeirdNAnnoyed Editchecker123 (talk) 06:14, 8 July 2023 (UTC)
- Comment This almost seems more like a part of a WP:WIKIPROJECT, is there an appropriate one that might benefit from it. It seems to be primarily put together by User:Numbersinstitute, so perhaps they'd like it userfied until a good Wikiproject home could be found? —siroχo 07:20, 8 July 2023 (UTC)]
- I agree with this, it looks like a lot of good work went into the article and it is well sourced so ideally we would not delete it and it’s edit history if it could be preserved and reused in WP:WIKIPROJECT Editchecker123 (talk) 14:57, 8 July 2023 (UTC)]
- I agree with this, it looks like a lot of good work went into the article and it is well sourced so ideally we would not delete it and it’s edit history if it could be preserved and reused in
- Delete - WP:NOTDIRECTORY is irrelevant for an index. The point is to serve a navigational purpose linking to Wikipedia articles on a given subject. The problem is this just doesn't do that. It's a hodgepodge of subjects that sorta-kinda have something to do with these policies (but not convincingly). — Rhododendrites talk \\ 02:31, 11 July 2023 (UTC)]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.