Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Indigo FM Beechworth Yackandandah Rutherglen
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was speedy keep. Per
withdrew their deletion nomination, and there are no outstanding !votes for deletion. (non-admin closure) Mz7 (talk) 22:33, 11 March 2014 (UTC), revised 22:37, 11 March 2014 (UTC)
]
Indigo FM Beechworth Yackandandah Rutherglen
page is in french Ryanx7 (talk) 07:26, 11 March 2014 (UTC)
Delete - seems to be an article about theWP:A10 but it wasn't "recently created". Absolutely no reason to have that information at that title in French. Stalwart111 09:50, 11 March 2014 (UTC)]
- My mistake - the article about the radio station was replaced with the French content only in January. I've reverted those edits and have replaced the AFD tag. I'm not convinced that the radio station is notable either but that's a different thing entirely. Would be interested in the nominator's thoughts about whether this AFD should remain open. I don't think it was his intention to nominate that particular article for deletion but he may chose to nominate the original article anyway. Stalwart111 10:02, 11 March 2014 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Radio-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 12:42, 11 March 2014 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Australia-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 12:42, 11 March 2014 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Organizations-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 12:43, 11 March 2014 (UTC)
- Procedural Speedy Close. French-language text cited by nominator was clearly just a test edit or vandalism, which has now been rectified. If someone wants to re-nominate the fixed article, then they should put forward a new deletion proposal. Lankiveil (speak to me) 13:25, 11 March 2014 (UTC).
The reversion satisfies my immediate concerns per deletion request. Ryanx7 (talk) 17:08, 11 March 2014 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.