Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ines Rosales
Source: Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Wifione Message 18:05, 13 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Ines Rosales
- Ines Rosales (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
No assertion of notability per
WP:BIO on that basis alone, and I can't find any evidence online that she's done anything else that would justify an encylopedia article about her. Some of the content could usefully be merged to WNYW. Instawisdom (talk) 13:58, 22 January 2012 (UTC)[reply
]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Television-related deletion discussions. Instawisdom (talk) 13:59, 22 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of New York-related deletion discussions. —Instawisdom (talk) 13:59, 22 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 01:57, 23 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Relistedto generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
- Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Armbrust, B.Ed. Let's talkabout my edits? 17:22, 29 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Relistedto generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
- Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, CharlieEchoTango (contact) 05:57, 6 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete - this appears as an attempt to include Rosales with her own article, as her five co-anchors already have one themselves. SaveATreeEatAVegan 08:07, 6 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.