Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ingeborg de Beausacq

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. ✗plicit 03:03, 25 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Ingeborg de Beausacq

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

This article is extremely subjective and the facts have been challenged on the talk page. It's had tags about tone and verifiability since 2012. It appears to have been made following interviews with the subject herself. I tried searching for further information on her, and Google exclusively returns sites that have copied the text of this WP entry and a single self-published book from lulu.com, "The Singular Life of Countess Ingeborg de Beausacq". A search of my academic library results only in a few photo captions from magazines in the 1950s.

The subject does not appear to pass

WP:RS. I suspect the article itself might have been written by the author of the self-published book. asilvering (talk) 02:56, 18 November 2021 (UTC)[reply

]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. asilvering (talk) 02:56, 18 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Artists-related deletion discussions. asilvering (talk) 02:56, 18 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Women-related deletion discussions. asilvering (talk) 02:56, 18 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Photography-related deletion discussions. asilvering (talk) 02:56, 18 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Geography-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 03:11, 18 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Germany-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 03:11, 18 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Fashion-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 03:11, 18 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Artist fails
WP:NARTIST. I can't find any references online except the self-published book mentioned by the nominator. All the tagged issues are valid and date back to 2012. Issues on the talk page date back to 2008. The original editor has made few edits outside this article and has made no attempt to bring the article up to encyclopedic standards. WomenArtistUpdates (talk) 18:11, 18 November 2021 (UTC)[reply
]

Delete. Unless reliable sources can be found, this is nothing more than a hagiographic essay essentially based on a single non-reliable source about a subject who ultimately does not appear to meet notability criteria. --Kinu ^t/_c 18:32, 18 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this page.