Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Inline Freestyle World Championship

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Seraphimblade ^{Talk to me} 02:37, 5 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Inline Freestyle World Championship

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Almost none of the dozens of medalling participants save for a couple from over the last years of the championship are notable (as evidenced by the abundance of red links), and the only cited sources are primary. PopoDameron (talk) 20:45, 13 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The mentioned medalists are the best in the world of an official sport sanctioned by World Skate which has the full recognition of the

IOC. There are more sources than just the primary one. Arielo (talk) 12:46, 14 September 2022 (UTC)[reply

]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Events and Sports. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 19:01, 14 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - zero hits in google news for "Inline Freestyle World Championship" suggest that this isn't as big a sporting thing as it seems.
talk) 22:22, 17 September 2022 (UTC)[reply
]
This is not true at all. A Google search for that retrieves approximately 1500 results and +400k results without the quotes Arielo (talk) 20:36, 20 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Try checking again. They said on Google news not just a regular search. PopoDameron (talk) 21:50, 20 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 22:45, 20 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Relisting. Not eligible for a Soft Deletion as I'm reading Arielo's comments as a Keep.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 22:30, 27 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Comment - Although it has sources from Organizational websites but it lacks Mainstream coverage on media that makes it eligible for a soft delete. Surya^beej ^⋠talk⋡ 08:41, 3 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I think you need to read over

WP:SOFTDELETE. And what is this "Soft Keep" that you sometimes state as your opinion? Can you link to the policy explaining this? Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 00:42, 5 October 2022 (UTC)[reply

]

Delete. The article is entirely sourced to primary sources which lack independence from the subject. No evidence that the subject passes
WP:NSPORT.4meter4 (talk) 02:23, 5 October 2022 (UTC)[reply
]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this page.