Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Insane (Eminem song)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was redirect to Relapse (album). Arbitrarily0 ^(talk) 20:14, 17 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Insane (Eminem song)

Insane (Eminem song) (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log • AfD statistics

)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

non-notable song. Not released as a single and is a low-charting song. Str8cash (talk) 00:37, 10 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

• Keep it charted and is one of Eminem's most grotesct songs of all time = Noteable. Im not going to say anthing else on the topic
  STATicVerseatide talk 01:36, 10 April 2010 (UTC)[reply
  ]
• Delete. A song appearing on national charts is "probably" notable according to
  WP:Music. However, to quote the same article, "Notability aside, a separate article on a song is only appropriate when there is enough verifiable material to warrant a reasonably detailed article," which I am not convinced is the case here. - Vianello (Talk) 01:44, 10 April 2010 (UTC)[reply
  ]
• Delete since most of the sparse info in this article is already in the Relapse (album) article. The most exciting exception is the fact that "Insane" got to 85 on the Hot 100, which isn't even worth mentioning, if that's all there is to say about the song. There's not even enough here for a merge. — JohnFromPinckney (talk) 01:51, 10 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]
• Comment: STAT, please do not
  civil. Thanks. —Mike Allen 02:17, 10 April 2010 (UTC)[reply
  ]
• Merge to the album. The chart placing is worth mentioning, and it isn't mentioned in the album article. If it was added there, this could be redirected.--Michig (talk) 08:12, 10 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep. This, unlike the others is well edited and has references, just lacks a bit.--Eduardofoxx13 (talk) 18:04, 11 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep - It charted and has appropriate references. Deletion should not even be an option, since if this didn't meet the criteria for a standalone article, a merge or redirect to the album would be appropriate. Rlendog (talk) 22:24, 15 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]
• Update: I have merged the chart info and purported release date (same as the album's, hmmm...) into the
  Insane (Eminem song) will need to just point to the album's article. The one thing that I haven't "merged" over is info about the Insane "skit", which seems unnecessary, confusing, trivial, and... well, not worth moving. This article is (I claim) ready for either deletion or editing with #REDIRECT [[Relapse (album)]] replacing the current content. (I don't know what one does with the Talk page for such a redirected page. Does that get a Redirect too?) — JohnFromPinckney (talk) 08:40, 16 April 2010 (UTC)[reply
  ]
• Note: This debate has been included in the list of Albums and songs-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 15:38, 10 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.