Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Integration competency center

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's

talk page or in a deletion review

). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was no consensus. Sandstein 10:48, 14 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Integration competency center

Integration competency center (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Thisseems to be almost entirely based on a single book of that title--no real evidence for the specific phrase being in common use. The writing is a blend of OR and promotionalism . DGG ( talk ) 07:09, 22 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the

talk) 07:37, 22 June 2019 (UTC)[reply

]

Note: This discussion has been included in the

talk) 07:37, 22 June 2019 (UTC)[reply

]

Note: This discussion has been included in the

talk) 07:37, 22 June 2019 (UTC)[reply

]

• Keep. The term seems to have been commonly used a decade or more ago, and a google search throws up lots of examples. Most of these however are blogs, in-house corporate pieces or suchlike so while they demonstrate ubiquity they don’t support notability. Among the sources I found which do look like RS are the following - this, this, this and this. Mccapra (talk) 04:05, 29 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's

talk page or in a deletion review

). No further edits should be made to this page.