Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/International Dadaism Month

International Dadaism Month (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats

)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Unsourced for more than four years. I cannot find any RSes that discuss it. Now an editor has decided that it needs to be linked to individual days. If the content must be kept, merge it to Dada. Walter Görlitz (talk) 04:32, 31 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Arts-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 15:08, 1 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Visual arts-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 15:08, 1 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Events-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 15:08, 1 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Philosophy-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 15:08, 1 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

• Redirect to Lawrence, Kansas. Found a couple decent sources, but not even close to enough to sustain a stand-alone article. I would say Merge, but I've already added it to the Lawrence, Kansas article along with two sources. — Rhododendrites ^talk \\ 20:13, 1 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

• Redirect Concur with the above. This isn't a hoax—the mayor really did make this pronouncement—but nothing ever seems to have actually come of it, and there's no realistic possibility an article more than a couple of sentences long could ever be written. – 
  iridescent 22:52, 8 August 2015 (UTC)[reply
  ]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's

talk page or in a deletion review

). No further edits should be made to this page.