Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/International sports calendar 2013
Source: Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was merge to 2013 in sports. Courcelles 00:50, 18 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]
International sports calendar 2013
Creation after the
International sports calendar 2012 into 2012 in sports. The user creating this new article is perfectly aware of that decision, as he participated in the previous discussion (as I did also). - Nabla (talk) 23:11, 4 January 2013 (UTC)[reply
]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Sports-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 23:52, 5 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Lists-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 23:52, 5 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep WP:CCC + the formatting here is different and tackles the issue in the last one that it was messy. It is now more easily organised. Despise OSE, see the various political leders "by tenure"/"by..." Likewise, this is chronological reference, while the other is "by sport". This is also more organised than that as it lists more data like the winnersLihaas (talk) 02:53, 8 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Relistedto generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
- Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, -- Cheers, ey 00:16, 11 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- comment notified 4 users involved in editing the 2012 pageq.Lihaas (talk) 03:04, 11 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Merge to 2013 in sports. We aren't a calendar for upcoming events, parent page works fine for this topic. Secret account 04:58, 11 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Merge to 2013 in sports per above comment. Frankly, I don't see what the point of this page is, and, seeing as "2013 in sports" should cover all of this, it's very redundant, though I am happy to see that curling as a sport was covered. Prayerfortheworld (talk) 05:14, 11 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Its more comprehensive that that. How about proposal merging that INTO this? Title is better and format.Lihaas (talk) 05:49, 11 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Wouldn't it make more sense to merge a smaller article into a larger one? Besides, you can make edits on the 2013 in sports article to add comprehensiveness, including adding what you've done here. Format is a nonessential issue in that sense. I feel that the "2013 in sports" is simple and adequate. Prayerfortheworld (talk) 02:07, 15 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- But the title here is better and more consistent (a la the election calendar). The scope of the other article is much too broad to include non-professional sports as well. You know how big that page can get for domestic and sub-domestic titles? That is liable to be incomplete forever.Lihaas (talk) 22:12, 15 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Wouldn't it make more sense to merge a smaller article into a larger one? Besides, you can make edits on the 2013 in sports article to add comprehensiveness, including adding what you've done here. Format is a nonessential issue in that sense. I feel that the "2013 in sports" is simple and adequate. Prayerfortheworld (talk) 02:07, 15 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Merge to 2013 in sports. That seems to be a more suitable title (the "International sports calendar" makes it sound like a formal arrangement, when actually it's just a collection of various sports' calendars. Number 57 11:00, 17 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.