Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Internet Memory Foundation

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. JohnCD (talk) 21:37, 12 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Internet Memory Foundation

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Tagged as not showing sufficient

WP:GNG. Someone not using his real name (talk) 03:14, 5 October 2013 (UTC)[reply

]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Internet-related deletion discussions. Someone not using his real name (talk) 03:14, 5 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Organizations-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 18:26, 5 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Websites-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 18:26, 5 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Keep This is one of the larger and older web archiving organizations. It archives important collections[1] like the National Archives, CERN, etc.. The EU funding doesn't mean they are owned by the EU, it's an independent non-profit. It would pass
talk) 21:11, 5 October 2013 (UTC)[reply
]

Right, someone keeps creating articles about EU projects using very promotional and jargon-filled language (probably cut-n-paste from the proposals). It does not disqualify them per se but makes it harder to filter out the ones that are truly notable, and write articles in more neutral normal English about what they do. Let us work on this a bit and see if there are enough sources to justify. W Nowicki (talk) 20:21, 7 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Keep I looked up some books and scholarly papers, and it seems to qualify. Tried to remove some of the future tense promotional language. Still hard to guess what really happens there vs. the many other sites are listed under those research projects, but the projects are millions of Euros each, and are still going on nine years later. W Nowicki (talk) 00:08, 8 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this page.