Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Interstate 570 (Missouri)
Source: Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Ron Ritzman (talk) 01:03, 29 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Interstate 570 (Missouri)
- Interstate 570 (Missouri) (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
PROD contested by author; original rationale was: There is only one proposal for this designation, and the proposal hasn't risen to the level where it could actually come to pass. This fails WP:RS that this designation is being actively pursued. Exit list is pretty obviously original research. Kinu t/c 21:04, 21 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Also, please note the creator's only contributions are this article and related inclusion of I-570 in other places: the I-70 3DI template, the article on the list of 3DIs, and even including it in the exit list. --Kinu t/c 21:17, 21 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete—as PROD-er. I found only one single news item discussing this proposal, which tells me that this concept fails self-published website that repeated and elaborated on the proposal from the RS. Imzadi 1979 → 21:12, 21 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete where's the verifiability? --Rschen7754 21:26, 21 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete per WP:CRYSTAL. With only one proposal and no signs that this has been seriously considered, there's no indication this will be a road anytime soon, and the proposal itself fails the GNG. TheCatalyst31 Reaction•Creation 22:31, 21 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Missouri-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 15:24, 22 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Transportation-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 15:24, 22 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete per WP:CRYSTAL. Until propsoals like this are approved and have gained the necessary funding, we should have no article. This usually applies to stations on suburban rail schemes, but is just as applicable to a road. Peterkingiron (talk) 17:54, 22 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Merge and redirect to reliable source; while as mentioned above there is insufficent notability for an article of its own, there is no reason why a one-paragraph blurb in the future/proposed article cannot be had. - The Bushranger One ping only 06:14, 23 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete - While there is a reliable source mentioning the proposal of the road, it is not a formal proposal and should not have an article. Maybe a brief mention in Interstate 70 in Missouri is possible. Dough4872 14:50, 25 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.