Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Intifada – The Long Day of Rage

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was merge‎ to David Pratt (Scottish journalist), without prejudice to early recreation if and when new sources support that. A reasonable ATD, well supported by the views expressed here. Owen× ☎ 16:08, 27 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Intifada – The Long Day of Rage

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

I do not believe that the content of this article is notable per Wikipedia:Notability (books), as there are only 2 potentially reliable sources; RFC: Electronic Intifada is depreciated. As I do not believe that both sources can be counted towards the notability requirement, and as the original editor is unavailable, I would suggest a deletion.

Additionally, the use of RFC: Electronic Intifada by an author who does not appear to be an authority in their respective field as the primary source for the content of the book, meaning that the content cannot be sourced well. FortunateSons (talk) 16:11, 19 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Comment This is my first AfD, so anyone with more experience is very welcome to correct any errors made. Thank you in advance :) FortunateSons (talk) 16:24, 19 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@

Twinkle, which greatly simplifies the process. ARandomName123 (talk)^{Ping me!} 18:27, 19 January 2024 (UTC)[reply

]

Thank you, I will. Does it work on mobile, or do I need a desktop? FortunateSons (talk) 19:55, 19 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Quoting link above: "Twinkle is not yet compatible with the mobile skin Minerva Neue. However, someone has written a third party patch that you can install. Please follow the directions at User:Plantaest/TwinkleMobile." and also: "You must use a supported web browser." and "If you're using Windows, and you're using a touchscreen, you may need to tap and hold the "TW" button in order to get the options to come up." (from Wikipedia:Twinkle/doc) -My, oh my! (Mushy Yank) 18:42, 20 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Ah, I’ll try that next time, thank you! FortunateSons (talk) 19:13, 20 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Israel-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 17:32, 19 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Literature-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 17:32, 19 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Palestine-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 17:32, 19 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Military-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 17:32, 19 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Thank you! FortunateSons (talk) 19:56, 19 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Redirect to David_Pratt_(Scottish_journalist)#Selected_publications if the reviews are judged insufficient.-My, oh my! (Mushy Yank) 21:55, 19 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Not opposed To Keep in light of the review mentioned below. (Yet another one would indeed help but, above all, the redirect and merge could allow expanding the page about Pratt. As other users wish, really. Both are OK, I think.-My, oh my! (Mushy Yank) 10:47, 25 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Merge into David Pratt (Scottish journalist) (selectively) as a totally improper SPINOUT. Regardless of notability, the bio article is short and it does not discuss this book. Much of the book article content will be a welcome addition to the biography. gidonb (talk) 15:31, 21 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Keep. I found another review in ProQuest, from Reference and Research Book News; Portland Vol. 22, Iss. 4, (Nov 2007).
WP:NBOOK only requires two reviews, so if just one of Frontline Club or anphoblacht is considered reliable, that is an NBOOK pass. If neither is considered acceptable I can keep looking; I suspect there are more reviews out there in the databases. ~ L 🌸 (talk) 00:11, 24 January 2024 (UTC)[reply
]
I am not knowledgeable about the source and cannot access it; could you please elaborate on context and reliability? FortunateSons (talk) 18:42, 24 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Merge and redirect as suggested above. Llajwa (talk) 21:14, 25 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this page.