Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Intro sequence

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Delete. Michig (talk) 06:36, 1 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Intro sequence

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

I recently

WP:GNG in the same way outro did. —Torchiest ^talk_edits 00:52, 24 April 2016 (UTC)[reply

]

Delete as I'm not finding anything confidently better. SwisterTwister talk 07:12, 24 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Video games-related deletion discussions. SwisterTwister talk 07:12, 24 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the

talk) 21:52, 26 April 2016 (UTC)[reply

]

Delete. I agree, with my same rationale: there are intro sequences, but without
WP:VG/RS search engine brings up some results, but nothing in-depth about the actual concept. Notable intro sequences can be mentioned at its respective game. soetermans. ^{↑↑↓↓←→←→ B A TALK} 08:08, 28 April 2016 (UTC)[reply
]

Delete for the same reasons that Outro was deleted.
ZettaComposer (talk) 14:04, 28 April 2016 (UTC)[reply
]

Delete per nom. This article isn't prepared to do much better than a dictionary definition. czar 07:39, 29 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this page.