Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Introspector (program)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. JohnCD (talk) 16:51, 29 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Introspector (program) (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

I am unable to find significant coverage for this software. Fails

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Software-related deletion discussions. —Tom Morris (talk) 16:06, 22 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete - I didn't see any notable links on Google, Google News and Yahoo that would be appropriate for Wikipedia.SwisterTwister talk 20:52, 22 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete If a wikibook is the best independent coverage, it fails
  WP:GNG. FuFoFuEd (talk) 23:19, 25 August 2011 (UTC)[reply
  ]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.