Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Isabella Rositano

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's

talk page or in a deletion review

). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. Ad Orientem (talk) 01:36, 5 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Isabella Rositano

Isabella Rositano (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Article is about non-notable athlete that doesn't meet

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Women-related deletion discussions. Kb.au (talk) 04:55, 28 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Australia-related deletion discussions. Kb.au (talk) 04:55, 28 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Sportspeople-related deletion discussions. Kb.au (talk) 04:58, 28 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Keep National champion. Member of the national canoe team. World record holder. Plays football for Italy. AIS scholarship recipient. Plenty of independent coverage.[1][2][3][4] Easily passes

WP:GNG. None of the sources in the article are published by the subject. Hawkeye7 (discuss) 05:43, 28 January 2018 (UTC)[reply

]

• Keep -- if I'm reading this right https://canoe.org.au/2016/10/05/isabella-rositano/, she placed 1st in the national champrionship in 2016; this meets
  WP:NSPORT. Article is reasonably well cited at this point with appropriate amount of bio content; does not violate other guidelines. K.e.coffman (talk) 19:50, 28 January 2018 (UTC)[reply
  ]
• Delete. Just being a national champion does not always meet
  WP:NAFL. Scholarship holder, nothing that special there, lacks independent coverage. A Factiva search got zero hits for her unless she was also a student film director or actress (which she might be). duffbeerforme (talk) 07:18, 30 January 2018 (UTC)[reply
  ]

  Rubbish. Of course the governing body of a sport is independent of the athletes. Hawkeye7 (discuss) 08:42, 30 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

  No athletes, no sport, no sporting body. No sporting body, no national championships, no organized competitions. Each dependent on the other. Sporting bodies are to varying degrees employers who are clearly not independent. duffbeerforme (talk) 10:31, 30 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

  It's all a conspiracy. Hawkeye7 (discuss) 10:47, 30 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

• Keep per
  WP:ATD. Hmlarson (talk) 22:29, 30 January 2018 (UTC)[reply
  ]

• NSPORT? Kb.au (talk) 01:01, 31 January 2018 (UTC)[reply
  ]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's

talk page or in a deletion review

). No further edits should be made to this page.