Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Islamic Bill of Rights for Women in the Bedroom

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. There's no evident consensus whether to keep separately or merge, but that discussion may certainly continue on the talk page.--

Not every list created by an author deserves its own article. BhaiSaab ^talk 18:22, 15 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

• Merge with and redirect to
  Asra Q. Nomani. Picaroon9288 18:31, 15 October 2006 (UTC)[reply
  ]
• Speedy Keep The topic is notable and is the subject of a great deal of media and academia coverage [1]and most notably the topic is highly relevant within the context of the Islamic feminism movement and refered to in other Wikipedia articles.--CltFn 21:16, 15 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

That's only one university's events page which mentions it twice. BhaiSaab ^talk 02:32, 16 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

• Merge and redirect as per above. --InShaneee 21:52, 15 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]
• Merge and redirect Laudable, but apparently not widely established even in academic discourse yet[2]. (Also the article content needs a little POV tweaking) Bwithh 00:21, 16 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep The Nomani article can't hold everything. Certainly notable enough for an article. Azate 07:37, 16 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

It's not as if her article is already very long - on the contrary, it could use more content. Regarding notability, even a Google web search returns less than 30 unique results. [3] BhaiSaab ^talk 09:57, 16 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

• Merge and redirect, this could someday be an article on its own but it needs to become more notable (i.e. more references to it in the published media or in books). For now, it may as well be put into the
  Asra Q. Nomani article. I would also be OK with a Keep decision. I definitely disagree with deleting the article. --Richard 18:31, 16 October 2006 (UTC)[reply
  ]

• 'Rename - What a weird title for a page.Bakaman _Bakatalk 00:58, 17 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]
• Comment I can't really decide on this independent of
  99 Precepts for Opening Hearts, Minds and Doors in the Muslim World and [[Islamic Bill of Rights for Women in the Mosque]. gren グレン 08:26, 17 October 2006 (UTC)[reply
  ]
• Keep, as per Azate above. Smeelgova 04:34, 18 October 2006 (UTC).[reply]
• Keep, there's no need to censor this. - ulayiti (talk) 15:48, 23 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

What does this have to do with censorship? It has to do with the appropriateness of an article about a list which virtually no one talks about in scholarly or even non-scholarly discourse. BhaiSaab ^talk 10:01, 26 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

• Keep per above. Ultra Megatron 03:06, 24 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep, very helpful in helping me write my paper on Islamic Feminism. Keep! —The preceding
  unsigned comment was added by 161.6.41.128 (talk • contribs
  ) .

User's first edit. BhaiSaab ^talk 10:01, 26 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.