Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Islamic Front–Free Syrian Army conflict

Add links
Source: Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was no consensus. No consensus to delete, but failing that there seems to be agreement about renaming the article.  Sandstein  12:17, 1 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Islamic Front–Free Syrian Army conflict

talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats
)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

talk) 05:06, 8 December 2013 (UTC)[reply
]

Note: This debate has been included in the
talk to me 05:25, 8 December 2013 (UTC)[reply
]

Rename I agree with lothar's proposal of creating an article of rebel infighting,this is so insignificant,rebel groups are constantly fighting with each other sometimes,and an article about the infightings will suitable,than just making multiple,insignificant articles on every infighting that occurs.

talk) 05:34, 8 December 2013 (UTC)[reply
]

And also the renamed article must include also the former infighting.

talk) 05:34, 8 December 2013 (UTC)[reply
]

Agree The ISIL and Nusra have clashed according to the Reuters source in the article, but no article has to be made for it; it isn't systematic fighting, it has occurred on a sporadic basis.David O. Johnson (talk) 05:49, 8 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Rename per Lothar and Alhanuty. EkoGraf (talk) 05:51, 8 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Rename Rename it than. Or just change it to a battle. --SourCreamShoe (talk) 06:40, 8 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

  • Delete. Wait until we have solid reliable sources, time-independent from the incident, before we decide that this is a significant incident. Do we have time-independent reliable sources discussing other incidents of infighting, establishing that it's a notable part of the war? If so, I wouldn't have any objections to the renaming issue. Nyttend (talk) 20:56, 8 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Military-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 00:56, 9 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Of course they would say that, they are doing damage control now so to save any credibility they have left. If it was really ISIS why did it take them a full week to say it? In any case, I'm also for the delete or rename since the conflict is small in scale. EkoGraf (talk) 16:49, 13 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Relisted
to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
SarahStierch (talk) 20:22, 16 December 2013 (UTC)[reply
]
Relisted
to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
SarahStierch (talk) 04:00, 24 December 2013 (UTC)[reply
]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this page.
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Islamic_Front–Free_Syrian_Army_conflict&oldid=1088294961"