Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Júlio César Alves

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's

talk page or in a deletion review

). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was no consensus. SoWhy 10:15, 18 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Júlio César Alves

Júlio César Alves (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Non notable entity, rumoured to have provided steroids. If wikipedia allowed rumours, we would not be wikipedia any more. 2Joules (talk) 08:27, 2 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Multiple reliable sources have reported about him internationally for years. Omikroergosum (talk) 08:35, 2 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

::NO! They have reported a rumor, never confirming anything, and they are not that reliable anyway. 2Joules (talk) 08:40, 2 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. MT Train^Talk 08:41, 2 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Brazil-related deletion discussions. MT Train^Talk 08:41, 2 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This is in-depth investigative journalism, involving undercover interviews, and ARD is the public German broadcaster that already revealed the Russian doping system, leading to the withdrawal of several Olympic medals and the exclusion of the Russian team from the winter Olympics. If you don't know anything about a topic, maybe just leave decisions about it to others? Omikroergosum (talk) 08:45, 2 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

:::@[User:Omikroergosum]] The purpose of an AFD is to leave the decision to others. I have nominated the article, it is up to other editors to vote. 2Joules (talk) 08:59, 2 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

And why do you have to spread lies to influence it (sources not reliable, only rumours...) before even trying to communicate with editors who know about the subject? And why have you as a user who started editing just 3 months ago already attracted a sockpuppet investigation, accusations of paid editing, and four denied speedy deletions on your talk page (plus several others in the past)? Omikroergosum (talk) 09:26, 2 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

@User:Omikroergosum Because I nominate promotional and non notable articles for deletion. You should see the new Lambo I just ordered. For every successful AFD WIKIPEDIA pays me $1000. 2Joules (talk) 10:44, 2 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete subject is mentioned in a few secondary sources, but is the primary subject of few / if any, and therefore fails
  WP:NPOV. --HunterM267 ^talk 17:08, 2 July 2018 (UTC)[reply
  ]

• Comment-Sorry to say, my Spanish is not great. Hence, not a Keep or Delete iVote. However, looking at Google News, here [1], Mr. Alves seems to meet our Notability criteria.ShoesssS ^Talk 18:55, 10 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's

talk page or in a deletion review

). No further edits should be made to this page.