Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/J30 protests

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Tone 13:23, 5 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

J30 protests (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log

)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

with just a few hundred internet hits, including twitter, demotix and indymedia, clearly not a term in use by the big public. Maybe worth a redirect to another place, but on its own not noteworthy.

• Delete. I cant find evidence of the term used in reliable sources and it's an unlikely search term. As it stands, the article is basically a dicdef. Pburka (talk) 16:59, 29 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of United Kingdom-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 01:40, 30 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Events-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 01:41, 30 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Politics-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 01:41, 30 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete. I'm not sure this even warrants a mention in the
  2011 United Kingdom anti-austerity protests article. The only source I can find which might qualify as reliable is the indymedia one, and I have a strong suspicion this source is not actually independent. Chris Neville-Smith (talk) 08:14, 30 October 2011 (UTC)[reply
  ]

Relisted

to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, —Tom Morris (talk) 00:36, 5 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete as speedily as possible. One sentence "article". Doesn't even attempt to establish notability. Tigerboy1966 (talk) 00:38, 5 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.